{"id":1425,"date":"2026-06-23T20:17:51","date_gmt":"2026-06-23T20:17:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/?p=1425"},"modified":"2026-06-23T20:17:51","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T20:17:51","slug":"fortibleed-targeted-fortigate-firewalls-in-110-million-credential-harvesting-operation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/?p=1425","title":{"rendered":"FortiBleed Targeted FortiGate Firewalls in 110 Million-Credential Harvesting Operation"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<p><span class=\"p-author\"><i class=\"icon-font icon-user\">\ue804<\/i><span class=\"author\">Ravie Lakshmanan<\/span><i class=\"icon-font icon-calendar\">\ue802<\/i><span class=\"author\">Jun 23, 2026<\/span><\/span><span class=\"p-tags\">Initial Access Broker \/ Firewall Security<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"articlebody\">\n<div class=\"separator\" style=\"clear: both;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogger.googleusercontent.com\/img\/b\/R29vZ2xl\/AVvXsEhJkhDD5qINhfAhBFXG2C13raQF6T6zAOmnHlArhnLUP5z0ifBzpyq6M_4n11cgynQfZW0mxJWnYU-TDYSpKQHYFHvXsZHCB7uoMFg0w02yZILY-JLMm2-uqm-CA_wIqZHhzl25FfO_lMd7dYm6VfprDP83bz_SoB3MWLEc059E4YCa554bba-qWHW5udHv\/s1700-e365\/fortigate.jpg\" style=\"display: block;  text-align: center; clear: left; float: left;\"><\/a><\/div>\n<p>A Russian-speaking initial access broker (IAB) driven by financial gain is assessed to be behind a large-scale credential-harvesting operation known as <b>FortiBleed<\/b> that has targeted over 430,000 FortiGate firewalls globally.<\/p>\n<p>The campaign, active since February 2026, involves collecting credential lists, searching for exposed services, brute-forcing accessible systems, and deploying bespoke sniffers on compromised firewalls.<\/p>\n<p>\u00abOnce deployed, these sniffers capture cleartext and hashed credentials from traffic passing through compromised devices,\u00bb SOCRadar <a href=\"https:\/\/socradar.io\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/06\/Dismantling-FortiBleed.pdf\">said<\/a> [PDF] in a fresh report. \u00abThe actors then crack, validate, and reuse the credentials against Active Directory domains and other exposed services.\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>Central to the operation is a Golang-based tool called <b>FortigateSniffer <\/b>that takes advantage of the FortiOS built-in diagnostic command -diagnose sniffer packet to passively capture authentication traffic from the infected appliances. The tool is designed to monitor traffic across 24 protocols, parse authentication data, and extract the credentials.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s suspected that the threat actors may have sought the help of an open-source, AI-native offensive security platform dubbed <a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/CyberStrikeus\/CyberStrike\">CyberStrike<\/a> to assist with some \u00abparts of the workflow.\u00bb Interestingly, another open-source framework called CyberStrikeAI was put to use in connection with another automated mass scanning campaign targeting FortiGate devices that Amazon Threat Intelligence exposed earlier this year.\u00a0<\/p>\n<div class=\"dog_two clear\">\n<div class=\"cf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thehackernews.uk\/ai-cant-stop-d\" rel=\"nofollow noopener sponsored\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload\" alt=\"Cybersecurity\" src=\"https:\/\/blogger.googleusercontent.com\/img\/b\/R29vZ2xl\/AVvXsEjPEV6-530TOlxG6PjrmdlY623wpBwduZ7t1HV6flcmO5R4q4AmfixDUzW0CrhlvMVNWbhvOIso-UDNTka4W_W9Chrdj_dglwBZwi7DuePM2IMIl-hfUYVIqBXgfpr_2619K8Gptb4LzwJ6gUbi7lWl2M8AFQJsHEaw63Q7tZ6708YGruiHrr0Y2W9YYxLQ\/s728-e100\/ThreatLocker-d.png\" width=\"729\" height=\"91\"\/><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>\u00abThe campaign shows a heavy focus on Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) with fewer than 200 employees,\u00bb the SOCRadar explained. \u00abThe actor targets multiple sectors and regions, with notable emphasis on the United States and India. The IT services sector appears to be a key target. This targeting choice likely helps the actor maximize downstream access, as compromised service providers can create access paths into customer environments.\u00bb<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"more\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the most interesting finding is that FortiBleed appears to be part of a broader, multi-vendor initial access operation that&#8217;s orchestrated to not only target Fortinet devices, but also breach Synology NAS, Sophos firewalls, RDWeb portals, Citrix SSL-VPNs, and MS-SQL servers using automated brute-forcing since February 28, 2026.<\/p>\n<div class=\"separator\" style=\"clear: both;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogger.googleusercontent.com\/img\/b\/R29vZ2xl\/AVvXsEhZZyYbrLcpVz_CoSfqeQXURaddHErJYJte9jiJC2E9d_OThVClTl-Lu53FHSyEGDOTOSs6KLkcrHPXNwBPiU9Nn02KBNNvkcdm-N-sdP7i1TLqyb4iIak96JmKs4FY-PBLDquXpxCYc32TXpaet5qYdHuALHf0sPp6TtMmwLzKvkjPxZ7EDzoQnS5zQfZJ\/s1700-e365\/fort.jpg\" style=\"clear: left; display: block; float: left;  text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/blogger.googleusercontent.com\/img\/b\/R29vZ2xl\/AVvXsEhZZyYbrLcpVz_CoSfqeQXURaddHErJYJte9jiJC2E9d_OThVClTl-Lu53FHSyEGDOTOSs6KLkcrHPXNwBPiU9Nn02KBNNvkcdm-N-sdP7i1TLqyb4iIak96JmKs4FY-PBLDquXpxCYc32TXpaet5qYdHuALHf0sPp6TtMmwLzKvkjPxZ7EDzoQnS5zQfZJ\/s1700-e365\/fort.jpg\" alt=\"\" border=\"0\" data-original-height=\"531\" data-original-width=\"1095\"\/><\/a><\/div>\n<p>In all, the attackers are estimated to have launched no less than 659 credential-harvesting pipelines on May 31 and June 15, 2026, resulting in the identification of over 110 million credentials. This included &#8211;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>14.8 million Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) credentials<\/li>\n<li>924,000 NTLM hashes<\/li>\n<li>130,000 Kerberos hashes<\/li>\n<li>89 million MySQL authentication tokens<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The FortiBleed campaign takes place over five stages &#8211;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Perform widespread reconnaissance using tools like Masscan and Shodan to identify vulnerable internet-facing FortiGate firewalls, followed by using a custom utility dubbed FortiProbe-fast and GeoSplit to filter FortiGate systems and group them by country, respectively.<\/li>\n<li>Compromise the devices with a credential checker named \u00abforticheck\u00bb that specifically targets FortiGate&#8217;s administrative panel and SSL-VPN portal, along with using tools to obtain administrative SSH access via credential stuffing and dictionary attacks.<\/li>\n<li>Upon establishing access via SSH, FortigateSniffer is deployed to passively intercept authentication traffic across 24 protocols (e.g., TACACS+, Kerberos, RPC, SMB, LDAP, SMTP, FTP, Telnet, RDP, WinRM, MS-SQL, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and RADIUS) using native FortiOS diagnostic commands, making it possible to harvest cleartext credentials and password hashes.<\/li>\n<li>The password hashes are cracked using Hashmat and Hashtopolis, and orchestrated by a Telegram bot named HASHBOT, after which they are used for lateral movement and Active Directory enumeration.<\/li>\n<li>Sensitive data from network shares is exfiltrated while stolen session cookies are used to maintain persistent, authenticated access.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>\u00abThe group does not treat all targets equally,\u00bb SOCRadar said. \u00abInstead, targets are ranked according to economic value before exploitation resources are allocated.\u00bb<\/p>\n<div class=\"dog_two clear\">\n<div class=\"cf\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thehackernews.uk\/vpn-threat-report-m\" rel=\"nofollow noopener sponsored\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"lazyload\" alt=\"Cybersecurity\" src=\"https:\/\/blogger.googleusercontent.com\/img\/b\/R29vZ2xl\/AVvXsEhFlTC7RrRZGiFAgASS0noWSL0qsQGFVp8-Hvuw9yp3X3VKRuTcb5SsPX09wJzrdIM6pu1_5lS4EeZp7Sx4iYBpNJkrGnpr08yyaS1HQ5_5TxaCsP6O0OtHNuOkesn6CbNjao1GPulCJk-uljYMSfMZfBYNrngpe669t7jlRn1FqiEnXhsFD1WVkpaYIVgh\/s728-e100\/ai-d.jpg\" width=\"729\" height=\"91\"\/><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>What&#8217;s more, the sniffing mechanism includes a geofencing filter that restricts operations to specific IP ranges, not to mention limiting the activity to between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. Moscow Time. According to data <a href=\"https:\/\/spycloud.com\/blog\/what-spycloud-found-inside-the-fortibleed-threat-actor-infrastructure\/\">captured<\/a> by SpyCloud, the FortiGate-related capture cycle is said to have commenced on May 19, 2026, with the hash cracking infrastructure set up towards the end of the month.<\/p>\n<p>\u00abThe operation runs in a pipeline of 300-minute (five-hour) cycles, with status every minute,\u00bb Zenox said. \u00abIn each cycle it loads a regional target list [&#8230;] and validates with 1,000 simultaneous threads, displaying counters of success, failure, timeout, and warning. In the first cycles, the successful validation rate hovered near 90%.\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>The Brazilian cybersecurity company also said it found certain username and password pairs to be repeated across thousands of distinct IP addresses, raising the possibility that the accounts have been planted by the attacker as a clandestine backdoor entry point.<\/p>\n<p>The development comes as a Russian-speaking account named \u00ab<a href=\"https:\/\/spycloud.com\/blog\/what-spycloud-found-inside-the-fortibleed-threat-actor-infrastructure\/\">SantaAd<\/a>\u00bb has <a href=\"https:\/\/socradar.io\/blog\/fortibleed-sens-unique-paris-libsodium-dos\/\">advertised<\/a> access to thousands of Fortinet devices for a starting price of $30,000, before increasing it to $60,000 hours later. However, it&#8217;s unclear if this has any connection to the FortiBleed exposure.<\/p>\n<p>\u00abThe threat actor group behind &#8216;FortiBleed&#8217; was not just targeting FortiGate VPNs,\u00bb SpyCloud said. \u00abThey were actually targeting a range of different internet-facing appliances with a standard spray-and-pray attack chain that relies mostly on mass scanning and brute-forcing logins.\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\ue804Ravie Lakshmanan\ue802Jun 23, 2026Initial Access Broker \/ Firewall Security A Russian-speaking initial access broker (IAB) driven by financial gain is assessed to be behind a large-scale credential-harvesting operation known as&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1426,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2166,2110,174,2168,2167,287,113],"class_list":["post-1425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-firewalls","tag-fortibleed","tag-fortigate","tag-harvesting","tag-millioncredential","tag-operation","tag-targeted"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1425"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1425\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1426"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/thedigitalfortress.us\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}